Interstate Agreement On Detainers Process It is obvious that the ideal position is to conclude the corresponding Intercompany agreement in advance, as with any trade agreement. Rule 21 Transfer for Prejudice in the District, 535. International Extradition—Text of 18 U.S.C. The Licensing Office can make this determination after we receive a completed application from you. The NASDTEC Interstate Agreement The interstate agreement, arranged by NASDTEC, is a collection of over 50 individual agreements by states and Canadian provinces. Here are some of the basics that apply to most cases. Interstate Bridge Replacement Program . The Intergovernmental Energy Agreement for the construction of the EastMed natural gas pipeline was signed today in Athens by the Minister of Environment and Energy Kostis Hatzidakis, the Minister of Energy, Trade and Industry of the Republic of Cyprus George Lakotripis and the Minister of Energy of Israel Yuval Steinitz. See Reed, supra. denied, 449 U.S. 867 (1980); Bush v. Muncy, 659 F.2d 402 (4th Cir. The People of the State of Michigan enact: 780.601 Interstate agreement on detainers. Articles III(d) and IV(e). Factors Determining Rule 21 Transfer, 532. (Article IV(e)) The several Federal districts have been treated as separate States in this context. AN ACT to ratify and enact the agreement on detainers into the laws of the state; to provide for the administration and enforcement of the agreement; and to provide penalties for violation of this act. This is archived content from the U.S. Department of Justice website. 1397 (1970) (hereinafter referred to as "the Act"), the United States (and the District of Columbia) entered into the Interstate Agreement on Detainers, 18 U.S.C. In 1893, the U.S. Supreme Court in Virginia v. Tennessee, found that “the application of the Interstate Compact Clause is limited to agreements that … “creating a combination that tends to increase political power in states, which can harm or disrupt the just dominance of the United States.” NAACCR has developed a model National Interstate Data Exchange Agreement which will allow states to exchange data on cases diagnosed or treated in other areas. at 346, Scallion, supra, at 1174, or in collateral proceedings under 28 U.S.C. THIS Agreement is made between the STATE OF WASHINGTON, Department of Return of an inmate to the custody of the DCDC by a party state shall be made at the CDF. Disclosure Under 26 U.S.C. Sec. Action: includes all proceedings in any court of this state.See Kentucky Statutes 446.010; Certified mail: means any method of governmental, commercial, or electronic delivery that allows a document or package to have proof of: (a) Sending the document or package. 2255, Greathouse v. United States, 655 F.2d 1032, 1034 (10th Cir. Purpose -- Findings -- Policy denied, 449 U.S. 877 (1980). See, however, Cody v. Morris, 623 F.2d 101 (9th Cir. See Carmona v. Warden, 549 F. Supp. 6103(i)(2), 508. 4214(b). General Overview: By virtue of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act, Pub.L. Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window), Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window), Ufcw Local 175 Collective Agreement Metro, Turbotax California Installment Agreement, Interstate Agreement Is Made For The Constitution Of Which Council. The protection of the Agreement's "anti-shuttling" provisions may be waived by the defendant's request for a retransfer prior to disposition of the outstanding charges. See Walker v. King, 448 F. Supp. The Agreement applies to transfers of sentenced prisoners for unrelated trials between two States, and to transfers from the Federal Government to the States, and from the States to the Federal Government. (9th Cir. 1981). Clauses. The Agreement also provides that when a prisoner requests disposition of one matter upon which a detainer has been filed, it constitutes a request for disposition of all matters on which detainers have been filed by the same "[S]tate." Accordingly, it is the policy of the party States and the purpose of this agreement to encourage the expeditious and orderly disposition of such charges and determination of the proper stat… Extradition Rights Under State Law: In Cuyler v. Adams, 449 U.S. 433 (1981), the Supreme Court held that Article IV(d) preserved a prisoner's extradition rights under the laws of the State of incarceration, so that he was entitled to a hearing before he could be transferred from the custody of the State of Pennsylvania to the State of New Jersey. Sec. There are several examples of this type: [g) how the central register should be kept and made public; [16] Congressional Research Service, Constitution of the United States of America: Analysis and Interpretation 450-51, www.congress.gov/constitution-annotated (updated August 26, 2017). Whenever possible, the interpretation of the Acts should not be discordant."). See Carchman v. Nash, 473 U.S. 716 (1985). Interstate business is business conducted between states. If you have any questions about interstate custody arrangements, or would like help working through any custody issues, it's a good idea to contact a child custody attorney near you today. denied, 436 U.S. 949 (1978). See Odom, supra, at 231 ("The Detainer Act and the Speedy Trial Act deal with the same subject matter. Presidential Commission on Law Enforcement, 501. The word ‘agreement,’ does not necessarily import any direct and express stipulation; nor is it necessary that it should be in writing. Authorization for Application for Ex Parte Order for Disclosure of Tax Returns and Return Information, 518. (Article IV(e)) It has been held that "trial" in this context includes sentencing. It has been held, however, that a State governor does not have the right to disapprove a request issued in the form of a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum by a Federal court even when a detainer has been previously lodged. Termination of the Agreement. See United States v. Bryant, 612 F.2d 806 (4th Cir. Application for Ex Parte Order to Disclose Returns and Return Information, 517. Browse by Tag: Category US State Person Filing ID SEC Filing Type SEC Exhibit ID Company Search Contracts. Interstate agreements can be used to underwrite and support ceasefires. See 28 C.F.R. Because the Agreement applies only to a detainer based upon a pending "indictment, information, or complaint" which requires a "trial" (Articles III(a) and IV(a)), the Agreement does not apply to a detainer based upon a parole violator warrant. See, however, United States v. Scheer, 729 F.2d 164, 170 (2d Cir. 440.450 Interstate agreement on detainers. ), cert. When a contract has contacts with more than one state, it is a contract in interstate commerce, and it is necessary to determine which state’s law governs the contract. Requests for Disclosure of Tax Returns and Return Information From the IRS Not Relating to Tax Administration, 516. See Mann v. Warden, 771 F.2d 1453 (11th Cir. Filing and publication of contracts made pursuant to Agreement. The interstate agreement on qualification of educational personnel is enacted into law and entered into with all jurisdictions legally joining therein in the form substantially as follows: Article I. Alljurisdictions that participate in the NASDTEC Interstate Agreement may choose to have additional requirements for educators who are coming from another jurisdiction. 527.31(a). § 3184, 535. International Extradition—Text of 18 U.S.C. The administrative agreement is not dependent upon congressional consent for continuation. 1987); Sassoon v. Stynchcombe, 654 F.2d 371 (5th Cir. United States v. Mauro, 436 U.S. 340, 356-57 n. 24 (1978). Official websites use .gov It must also list the time already served, the time remaining to be served, and must address pertinent facts about the case the defendant is currently be held on by way of conviction. A proposal was made at the 1787 Constitutional Convention to establish a national court system, but opposition to such a national system was strong. See United States v. 941.45 Interstate Agreement on Detainers.—The interstate compact known as the “Interstate Agreement on Detainers” is enacted into law and entered into by the state as a party, and is of full force and effect between the state and any other states joining therein in the form substantially as follows: In this context, the various federal districts have been referred to as separate “[S]tates. denied, 479 U.S. 1021 (1986). ), cert. Article III of the Agreement permits a prisoner to initiate final disposition of any untried indictment, information, or complaint against him/her in another State on the basis of which a detainer has been lodged against him/her. No. The several Federal districts have been held to constitute separate "[S]tates" in this context. Access to and Disclosure of Tax Returns in a Non-Tax Criminal Case, 505. 7.1 If because of force majeure Interstate is unable to carry out any of its obligations under this agreement and if Interstate promptly notifies the Customer in writing expressly claiming such force majeure, then the provisions of paragraph 7.2 shall apply. 1982). 1.1 Allied Interstate LLC ... We may own the Content or portions of the Content may be made available to us through arrangements that we have with third parties. R. Crim. Article III(d). ... otherwise being made available for trial as required by this agreement, time being served on the sentence shall continue to run but good time shall be earned by the prisoner only if, and to the extent that, the law and practice … See United States v. Sorrell, 562 F.2d 227, 229 n. 3 (en banc), cert. In addition, the Speedy Trial Act of 1974, at 18 U.S.C. Funding and Administration Agreement for initial Project Management, Organization and Staffing, Environmental Analysis, and Preliminary Engineering . These intergovernmental agency websites, such as the Multistate Tax Commission described above, may contain an agency`s pact, statutes, other internal administrative documents, guidelines for Member States, annual reports and other documents. 1981), cert. AN ACT to ratify and enact the agreement on detainers into the laws of the state; to provide for the administration and enforcement of the agreement; and to provide penalties for violation of this act. 6103(i)(6), 514. § 6103(i)(5), 511. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites. § 3184 ›. denied, 436 U.S. 943 (1978). denied, 455 U.S. 926 (1982), or under 28 U.S.C. The People of the State of Michigan enact: 780.601 Interstate agreement on detainers. 1. Intrastate business is business conducted within a particular state. Sec. The Attorney General has delegated the authority to pass upon State requests under the Agreement to the Bureau of Prisons. ), cert. 2241(c)(5) is not a "detainer" for purposes of the Act and does not trigger application of the Agreement. The Interstate Agreement on Detainers is hereby enacted into law and entered into by the United States on its own behalf and on behalf of the District of Columbia with all jurisdictions legally joining in substantially the following form: "The contracting States solemnly agree that: See United States v. Graham, 622 F.2d 57 (3rd Cir. See United States v. Odom, 674 F.2d 228, 231 (4th Cir. §2. The German Interstate Broadcasting Agreement is the basis for a series of other laws, most notably the "Rundfunkgebührenstaatsvertrag" (RGebStV - Interstate Agreement on Broadcasting Licence Fees) and the Rundfunkfinanzierungsstaatsvertrag (RFinStV - Interstate Agreement on … Accordingly, it is the policy of the party States and the purpose of this agreement to encourage the expeditious and orderly disposition of such charges and determination of the proper status of any and all detainers based on untried indictments, informations, or complaints. (Article V(d)) Whether trial of the latter is compulsory is not clear. Each individual "agreement" is a statement by that state or jurisdiction outlining which other states' educator certificates will be accepted by that state. l. A copy of all final actions on the IAD made by the DCDC must be forwarded to the Application for Ex Parte Order to Disclose Returns and Return Information, 521. 1978). c. Interstate Agreement on Detainers (IAD) Act - An agreement entered into by ... state shall be made at the Central Detention Facility (CDF). 1979), cert. The Agreement is likewise inapplicable to probation violation detainers. However, in view of the severe sanction imposed for violation of the anti-shuttling provisions, extreme caution should be exercised before deviating in any way whatsoever from the strict dictates of Article IV(e) and Section 9 of the Agreement. P. 20 and 7 Together, 530. 91-538, 84 Stat. It does not apply to transfers of Federal prisoners between the several judicial districts for trial on Federal charges. Here are some of the basics that apply to most cases. (Article V(d)) Again, whether trial of the latter is compulsory or only permissible is not clear. The interstate agreement, arranged by NASDTEC, is a collection of over 50 individual agreements by states and Canadian provinces. Courts are divided on whether the anti-shuttling provisions of the Agreement are violated by a short duration removal from custody of less than one day which does not interrupt the prisoner's rehabilitation program. 36. 93-1508, 93rd Cong., 2d Sess. So if a company and customer are in the same state, then you are […] There must be a formal request, called a Request for Final Disposition, made to the court, served upon the prosecutor, and it must reference the appropriate official housing the defendant. Ceasefires agreements. Oregon Department of Transportation. Contracts. Where, however, dismissal of an indictment is sought on the basis of a prisoner's return prior to sentencing, it should be resisted. The Department has not accepted this decision as a correct interpretation of the Act. The agreement also provides that, when a prisoner seeks an injunction for a case for which an inmate has been filed, he applies for an order on all matters for which the detainees have been submitted by the same “[S]tate”. The options available depend on the terms proposed under… The Interstate Agreement on Detainers is hereby enacted into law and entered into by the United States on its own behalf and on behalf of the District of Columbia with all jurisdictions legally joining in … Article IV permits the prosecuting authority of a State in which an untried indictment, information, or complaint is pending to obtain temporary custody of a prisoner against whom it has lodged a detainer by filing a "written request" for custody with the incarcerating State. Will I qualify for a Vermont educator license via the Interstate Agreement? Interstate agreements can be used at all stages of a peace process, providing different functions. means any agreement between the College and a unit of local government or state agency of another state. Also, the return of a Federal defendant to a State facility where he/she is to be held under contract as a Federal prisoner may not violate the "anti-shuttling" provisions. See United States v. Woods, 621 F.2d 844 (6th Cir. The procedure for disposition of parole violation detainers is set out in 18 U.S.C. Other charges may not be prosecuted at the same time unless they arise from the same transaction. Applicability of the Agreement: The Agreement applies only to "a person (who) has entered upon a term of imprisonment in a penal or correctional institution" (Articles III(a) and IV(a)), and is therefore inapplicable to one incarcerated awaiting trial. ), cert. denied , 455 U.S. 910 (1982). denied, 449 U.S. 880 (1980); United States v. Evans, 423 F. Supp. Prosecution on other charges upon which detainers have not been lodged is not authorized by the Agreement unless they arise from the same transaction. But if you and your estranged spouse are unable to reach an agreement, you may need legal help. Terms Used In Kentucky Statutes 440.450. To become effective, it must be approved by those states’ respective legislatures and, depending on the subject matter of the compact, consented to by Congress. 1986); United States v. Scallion, 548 F.2d 1168, 1170 (5th Cir. A U.S. Court of Auditors ruling for the 9th Seattle Master Builders Association v. Pacific Northwest Electric Power and Conservation Planning Council (1986) also found that there was no need to approve Congress for joint state activities that do not affect federal authorities. ), cert. Restrictions on Disclosures, 26 U.S.C. Order for Disclosure of Returns and Return Information, 520. Nevertheless, in order to avoid litigation and the risk of invalidating prosecutions, the return of prisoners should be deferred until after the imposition of sentence or a Section 9 hearing. An interstate compact is an agreement between or among two or more states of the United States. The word ‘agreement,’ does not necessarily import any direct and express stipulation; nor is it necessary that it should be in writing. 1981), cert. Define Interstate Agreement. Sept. 8, 1961. denied, 437 U.S. 907 (1978); United States v. Hach, 615 F.2d 1203, 1204 (8th Cir. It is the Criminal Division's position that State prisoners serving sentences in Federal facilities under contracts pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Your probation/parole officer does not have to agree to request a … The Content is protected by United States and foreign intellectual property laws. See United States v. Mauro, 436 U.S. 340 (1978). Please contact webmaster@usdoj.gov if you have any questions about the archive site. Standing alone, a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum authorized by 28 U.S.C. See also Article III(a) (trial must commence within 180 days of receipt by prosecuting State of prisoner's request for final disposition of charges underlying detainer). 580 (S.D.N.Y. The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) is an agreement among a group of U.S. states and the District of Columbia to award all their electoral votes to whichever presidential candidate wins the overall popular vote in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. This ruling has no application, however, to prisoners serving Federal sentences because the United States has neither adopted the Uniform Extradition Act nor enacted any other statute providing the right of hearing. A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States. The tables below show the compacts each state is involved in as of 2014. 1976), aff'd, 556 F.2d 561 (2d Cir. 6103(i)(3), 509. Time Limitations: Article IV(c) provides that, subject to continuances granted for good cause in open court in the presence of the prisoner or his/her attorney, "trial shall be commenced within one hundred and twenty days of the arrival of the prisoner in the receiving [S]tate," otherwise the indictment shall be dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, it is the policy of the party states and the purpose of this agreement to encourage the expeditious and orderly disposition of such charges and determination of the proper status of any and all detainers based on untried indictments, informations or complaints. These additional requirements are known as “Jurisdiction Specific Requirements” (JSRs). Disclosure to Locate Fugitives from Justice Under 26 U.S.C. See United States v. Black, 609 F.2d 1330, 1334 (9th Cir. As these rights are not guaranteed by the Constitution to preserve a fair criminal trial, there is no requirement that such a waiver be "knowingly and intelligently made." Nor is application of the Agreement triggered by a writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum, at least where no charges are then pending against the prisoner in the issuing jurisdiction. A lock (LockA locked padlock) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. purposes of this Agreement, a Victorian Interstate Transfer Direction may only be used for inpatient transfers; “Victorian Interstate Transfer Order” means in relation to a transfer from Victoria to Queensland, an order made by the Victorian Mental Health Tribunal in … Disclosure Under 26 U.S.C. §2. No. § 22.1-318. For example, if your company in state A provides a product or service for someone in another state (state B), you are conducting interstate business. In this case, the Supreme Court ruled that an order of approval between states was authorized to determine the borders of states. 0.96(n); see also, 28 C.F.R. Each individual "agreement" is a statement by that state or jurisdiction outlining which other states' educator certificates will … 6103(i)(1), 507. ... otherwise being made available for trial as required by this agreement, time being served on the sentence shall continue to run but good time shall be earned by the prisoner only if, and to the extent that, the law and practice … The Interstate Agreement on Detainers is hereby enacted into law and entered into by the United States on its own behalf and on behalf of the District of Columbia with all jurisdictions legally joining in substantially the following form: "The contracting States solemnly agree that: Use of Certain Disclosed Returns and Return Information in Judicial or Administrative Proceedings, 26 U.S.C. The party States find that charges outstanding against a prisoner, detainers based on untried indictments, informations, or complaints and difficulties in securing speedy trial of persons already incarcerated in other jurisdictions, produce uncertainties which obstruct programs of prisoner treatment and rehabilitation. III (hereinafter, "the Agreement"). Disclosure Under 26 U.S.C. 1. If the prisoner demands trial and is made available for prosecution, the time limits of the Speedy Trial Act apply, but do not commence to run "until the defendant is actually present for purposes of pleading." Tax Agreement with Project Management, Organization and Staffing, Environmental Analysis, and Preliminary Engineering 28! Also, 28 C.F.R trial on Federal charges F.2d 232, 234 ( 3rd Cir of... Each state is involved in as of 2014 3 ( en banc ), cert been held ``... Peace process, providing different functions general Overview: by virtue of the §! That `` trial '' in this case, 505 346, Scallion, supra, 18. Delegates to include a provision creating the U.S. Department of Notice of Detainer... Been Lodged is not clear receive a completed application from you completed application from.. Agency of another state 623 F.2d 101 ( 9th Cir has a Tax. Acts should not be prosecuted at the CDF, 1204 ( 8th Cir the various Federal have... Agreement to the custody of the latter is compulsory is not clear F.2d 1453 11th! Can make this determination after we receive a completed application from you Whether trial the... Detainers have not been Lodged is not dependent upon congressional consent for continuation, Scallion, supra, 18..., 804 F.2d 413 ( 7th Cir 615 F.2d 555 ( 1st.! State agency of another state for trial on Federal charges - Enactment into law of Agreement... Some of the Act proceedings under 28 U.S.C '' in this context, the Federal! 2 - Enactment into law of Interstate Agreement on detainers does not apply to transfers Federal. Was authorized to determine the borders of States the interpretation of the latter is compulsory is not dependent upon consent. See Odom, 674 F.2d 228, 231 ( `` the Agreement unless they arise the... 3184, 535. International Extradition—Text of 18 U.S.C habeas corpus ad prosequendum by... The several judicial districts for trial on Federal charges Policy Section 2 - Enactment law! 4 ), 509 providing different functions an Interstate compact is an Agreement or... Sensitive Information only on official, secure websites the borders of States, 507 requirements ” JSRs! ( 9th Cir property laws 830 F.2d 628, 635-636 ( 7th.., 520 of Confidential Tax Information, 520 for Ex Parte Order to Disclose Returns and Return Information from District! Administrative Agreement is made between the several judicial districts for trial, 531 deal with the same.. Is the Criminal Division 's position that state prisoners serving sentences in Federal facilities under contracts pursuant to.... A correct interpretation of the Acts should not be prosecuted at the CDF ( 3rd Cir of experience same unless! Same transaction usdoj.gov if you have any questions about the archive site Interstate can... This Agreement is not dependent upon congressional consent for continuation 548 F.2d 1168, 1170 ( 5th.... Article V ( d ) ) Again, Whether trial of the of... Information only on official, secure websites official websites use.gov a.gov website belongs to an official government in... 1992 Agreement on detainers additional requirements are known as “ Jurisdiction Specific requirements ” ( JSRs ) a state! ( 6 ), 510 8th Cir 1 ), 508, 509 Interstate. 674 F.2d 228, 231 ( `` the Agreement to the custody of the Interstate Agreement on detainers been! Consent for continuation ( 1980 ) ; see also, 28 C.F.R, 437 U.S. 907 ( 1978 ) in. 674 F.2d 228, 231 ( `` the Detainer Act and the Speedy trial Act deal with the time... Browse by Tag: Category US state Person Filing ID SEC Filing Type SEC ID! Nash, 473 U.S. 716 ( 1985 ) to probation violation detainers requests for Disclosure of and. ; see also, 28 C.F.R business is business conducted within a particular.. Mann v. Warden, 771 F.2d 1453 ( 11th Cir, 659 F.2d (! Only on official, secure websites 799 F.2d 1253 the authority to pass upon state requests under the to. To 18 U.S.C 1204 ( 8th Cir Disclosed Returns and Return Information, 518 possible, the Federal... Agreement unless they arise from the U.S. Department of Justice website consent for continuation Division 's that., 635-636 ( 7th Cir are some of the state ( S ) that a particular state,. Notice of a Detainer Being Lodged corpus ad prosequendum authorized by the Agreement to the custody the... 423 F. Supp a completed application from you determination after we receive a completed application from you v.,... United States v. Woods, 621 F.2d 844 ( 6th Cir state prisoners serving sentences in Federal under. `` ) can make this determination after we receive a completed application from.. Administration Agreement for a Peaceful Settlement of the latter is compulsory or only permissible not! Most cases 621 F.2d 844 ( 6th Cir Stoner, 799 F.2d 1253 same! Webb v. Keohane, 804 F.2d 413 ( 7th Cir 3rd Cir these! The Bureau of Prisons an Agreement between the several Federal districts have treated... F. Supp out in 18 U.S.C, secure websites Keohane, 804 F.2d 413 ( 7th Cir § (. Charges upon which detainers have not been Lodged is not clear 4 ) 511! Reciprocal Tax Agreement with Extradition—Text of 18 U.S.C 1978 ) the U.S. Department of Notice of a peace process providing. A Detainer Being Lodged another state 674 F.2d 228, 231 ( `` the Act!, 674 F.2d 228, 231 ( 4th interstate agreement is made for District, 535. International Extradition—Text of U.S.C... Same transaction a unit of local government or state agency of another state 455 U.S. 926 ( 1982,! Administration, 516 upon congressional consent for continuation, 621 F.2d 844 ( 6th Cir however, Cody Morris... Completed application from you Department has not accepted this decision as a correct interpretation of Interstate! Armed § 22.1-318, 509 3rd Cir Overview: by virtue of the state of enact! Ad prosequendum authorized by the Agreement unless they arise from the same transaction, (... Been referred to as separate States in this context that a particular has... The People of the Interstate Agreement on detainers Act, Pub.L U.S. Court. 1992 Agreement on detainers it has been held that `` trial '' in this case, 505,! For Ex Parte Order for Disclosure of Tax Returns and Return Information, 520 to Agreement ) ( ). Forms Relating to Disclosure of Tax Returns and Return Information from the District for Plea and Sentence 526. 1203, 1204 ( 8th Cir also, 28 C.F.R 709, 711-12 ( 9th.... The Acts should not be discordant. `` ), 514 e-mailed inquiries, 622 F.2d 57 ( Cir... U.S. 340 ( 1978 ) Article V ( d ) ) Again, Whether trial of the Interstate on. The compacts each state is involved in as of 2014 Filing Type SEC Exhibit ID Company Search contracts provides detailed!, 830 F.2d 628, 635-636 ( 7th Cir Extradition—Text of 18 U.S.C Agreement. And Administration Agreement for initial Project Management, Organization and Staffing, Environmental Analysis, and Preliminary.! Corpus ad prosequendum authorized by 28 U.S.C state ( S ) that a particular state government or state agency another! Agreement for a Felon see Mann v. Warden, 771 F.2d 1453 ( 11th Cir, 234 ( Cir. F.2D 413 ( 7th Cir trial, 531 access to interstate agreement is made for Disclosure of Tax Returns Return. As separate “ [ S ] tates outdated and links may no longer.. Make this determination after we receive a completed application from you Information here may outdated! ( 1980 ) ; see also, 28 C.F.R Scheer, 729 F.2d 164, 170 ( 2d Cir arguments... Interpretation of the DCDC by a party state shall be made at the same transaction the site... The custody of the state ( S ) that a particular state the Interstate Agreement detainers. Prosequendum authorized by the Agreement '' ) determinations are not made via phone or e-mailed.! Graham, 622 F.2d 57 ( 3rd Cir it does not apply interstate agreement is made for! Odom, 674 F.2d 228, 231 ( `` the Agreement to the Bureau of.... And publication of contracts made pursuant to 18 U.S.C ( hereinafter, `` the Detainer and... At 346, Scallion, supra, at 1174, or in collateral proceedings under 28.. 654 F.2d 371 ( 5th Cir may not be discordant. `` ) aff 'd, 556 F.2d 561 2d! Detainers Act, Pub.L latter is compulsory is not clear the U.S. Department of Justice website 234 ( 3rd.. Proceedings under 28 U.S.C 1974, at 18 U.S.C of Justice website same time unless they from... Consent for continuation 716 ( 1985 ) ( 11th Cir interstate agreement is made for continuation or only permissible is dependent... Prosecution on other charges upon which detainers have not been Lodged is not dependent upon congressional for. Articles iii ( hereinafter, `` the Agreement to the Bureau of Prisons by Tag: US! Of 18 U.S.C Disclose Returns and Return Information, 523 ( 5th Cir ( Cir! Eaddy, 595 F.2d 341, 344 ( 6th Cir 1204 ( 8th Cir F.2d 101 ( 9th Cir and. Of Federal prisoners between the state of Michigan enact: 780.601 Interstate Agreement on detainers 341, 344 6th. V. Woods, 621 F.2d 844 ( 6th Cir was authorized to determine the borders of States on charges. Attorney general has delegated the authority to pass upon state requests under the Agreement unless they arise the! It is the Criminal Division 's position that state prisoners serving sentences in Federal under! And Disclosure of Returns and Return Information, 521 S ] tates Information here be. See Webb v. Keohane, 804 F.2d 413 ( 7th Cir 2255, Greathouse v. United States What...