Congratulations PLOS! With this increased number of publications with peer review history under our belt, we’ve continued to see the highest opt-in rates in our journals publishing work in health or life-sciences. Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s) Result: Accepted directly Write a review: Reviewed 2019-02-01 16:11:40 It doesn't blow black, where academic speculators look, the first Chinese authors of Plos one are typical representatives...The problem is coming. The peer review process is ripe for abuse, with reviewers often acting as gatekeepers to suppress contradictory evidence and dissenting opinions. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. PLOS ONE, peer review, and a “crappy” acupuncture study. Our philosophy going into this project has been to open up the peer review process in a way that gives authors and reviewers more choices about how they publish and claim credit for their work. Manavalan and colleagues investigate the growing prevalence of hypertension in people living with HIV in Tanzania. Starting today, ALL PLOS journals will offer authors the option to publish their peer review history alongside their accepted manuscript! Our content is also machine readable, paving the way for deeper analysis and discussion by the community. My only concern is that it is not indexed in Web of Science. I would agree that the reviewers could stay anonymous, but let the other experts see it all. accepts scientifically rigorous research, regardless of novelty . You can find out more about how PLOS processes your data by reading our, Weekly digest: what’s happening in open science? PLoS ONE is an open access peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Public Library of Science (PLoS) since 2006. PLoS ONE Review Speed, Peer-Review Duration, Time from Submission to 1st Editorial/Reviewer Decision & Time from Submission to Acceptance/Publication PLOS ONE is doing an important step in the right direction, hopefully they will eventually make further moves. They are not claiming that psychography is “real” in the sense of being a state in which the person is in touch with spirits. Website Instructions for authors. A peer-reviewed, open access journal in science & medicine. When you choose to publish with PLOS, your research makes an impact. The Public Library of Science began in 2000 with an online petition initiative by Nobel Prize winner Harold Varmus, formerly director of the National Institutes of Health and at that time director of Memorial Sloan–Kettering Cancer Center; Patrick O. To be considered for this Collection, articles must be submitted by March 15, 2021. We’ve been excited to make this announcement, and make major strides towards a more open publication process, since last fall when we signed ASAPbio’s. Required fields are marked *, ORCID Ortman and colleagues explore the relationship between area and population in urban areas, using Settlement Scaling Theory to examine both historical and contemporary cities. Discover a faster, simpler path to publishing in a high-quality journal. PLOS One (stylized PLOS ONE, and formerly PLoS ONE) is a peer-reviewed open access scientific journal published by the Public Library of Science (PLOS) since 2006. Importantly, one does not need to abandon pre-publication peer review; scientists can (and should) have their work reviewed by colleagues before posting to such sites. PLOS ONE. By not excluding papers on the basis of subject area, PLOS ONE facilitates the discovery of the connections between papers whether within or between disciplines. Last checked date: 02/2020. Brown, a bioche… We’ve developed this option in consultation with our editors who are dedicated to improving our journals, and we also committed to reporting back our findings. We have taken a number of steps to remedy the situation. So far, Open Access has made it possible for research to reach a global community of readers but we have not yet demonstrated the work that goes on behind the scenes to validate scientific claims. committing to transparent peer review options. Schonger and Sele experimentally demonstrate that an effective graphical communication of infectious disease scenarios reduces the misperception of exponential disease spread. Because of the potential benefits, we’re making this option available. Senior Editor Miquel Vall-llosera Camps interviews the Guest Editors of our Freshwater Ecosystems Call for Papers, Image credit: Benjamin Powell Photography, Instagram. You can find out more about how PLOS processes your data by reading our, A new ophthalmosaurid ichthyosaur from the Upper Jurassic (Early Tithonian) Kimmeridge Clay of Dorset, UK, with implications for Late Jurassic ichthyosaur diversity, How to better communicate the exponential growth of infectious diseases, Tracing mobility patterns through the 6th-5th millennia BC in the Carpathian Basin with strontium and oxygen stable isotope analyses, “It’s because I think too much”: Perspectives and experiences of adults with hypertension engaged in HIV care in northern Tanzania, Ocean warming affected faunal dynamics of benthic invertebrate assemblages across the Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event in the Iberian Basin (Spain), Asymbiotic germination and morphological studies of seeds of Atlantic Rainforest micro-orchids (Pleurothallidinae), Explaining the increment in coronary heart disease mortality in Mexico between 2000 and 2012, Knowledge, attitudes, and acceptability of direct-acting antiviral hepatitis C treatment among people incarcerated in jail: A qualitative study, Geographical and social isolation drive the evolution of Austronesian languages, Modeling Cell Proliferation and the Cell Microenvironment Call for Papers, Early Detection and Minimal Residual Disease Call for Papers, Global Child and Adolescent Health Call for Papers. broad scope, and wide readership – a perfect fit for your research every time. Breadth of subject area: All of science. This could greatly influence the uptake. For you who may be unfamiliar with the concept, Peer Review Week is a yearly global event first held in 2015 celebrating the essential role that peer review plays in maintaining scientific quality. Koene and colleagues study the germination process in 11 orchid species from a threatened South American biome, which could support successful propagation of plants for reintroduction to the wild. The journal that published most of these papers was PLOS ONE. This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience. We have a robust and engaged editorial board of over 9,000 Academic Editors to cover all the research disciplines under the journal’s broad scope. General information ... Public Library of Science. PLOS ONE, PeerJ and other open access peer reviewed journals are coming as the best alternative academic publications to the conventional journals. I applaud this decision, but I also generally agree with Jamie. Asking librarians to run a peer-review process doesn’t strike me as a great idea. This process should be made completely transparent by providing the identity of reviewer(s) and author(s), publishing reviews and comments for manuscripts which are ultimately not accepted, as well as those that are, as well as acknowledging any working relationships between the two parties. journal, PLOS ONE. There is no one right way to do peer review. Peer review? Peer review by expert, practicing researchers. All manuscripts submitted after May 22, 2019 will be eligible for this option if accepted at a PLOS Journal. Unfair/nonsensical criticisms, outlandish comments, barely legible language, and unethical recommendations are frequently encountered in peer review, and those responsible hide behind a shield of anonymity. I suspect we might start to see some interesting trends emerge if this data were publicly available. 0000-0002-7299-680X). Learn More Submit Now About The crucial difference is that they can do this on their own terms, without a journal assigning reviewers of potentially questionable proficiency and commitment to the turnaround time. To be considered for this Collection, articles must be submitted by March 31, 2021. We’ve been excited to make this announcement, and make major strides towards a more open publication process, since last fall when we signed ASAPbio’s open letter committing to transparent peer review options. Add your ORCID here. We’re building off the foundations and lessons learned by these examples and are confident our model can offer authors more choices to make their research and the publishing process open, and showcase the rigorous review of their work. Unfair/nonsensical criticisms, outlandish comments, barely legible use of language, and unethical recommendations are frequently encountered in peer review, and those responsible hide behind a shield of anonymity. What is the title of the study, and who conducted the research? (e.g. You are right in principle. Congratulation PLOS ONE for a good and fantastic job your teams are doing to enhance science. It’s worth looking carefully at what that paper is actually about. As we learn more about how published peer review shapes author and reviewer choices, and reader experience, we’ll continue to update you on what we find. Your email address will not be published. Congratulations PLoS.. PLOS One is a well-respected peer-reviewed journal. In conjunction with the work it describes, peer review history can also be a source of material for educating students and the general public about peer review. PLoS ONE, the 'Open Access 2.0' journal trumpeted by the Public Library of Science, launched late last year. To be considered for this Collection, articles must be submitted by April 9, 2021. Here’s a look at the variations of open our opt-in model provides: A major step for PLOS, and scholarly communication. PLOS ONE ’s broad scope provides a platform to publish primary research, including interdisciplinary and replication studies as well as negative results. The authors should be given the option to publish the reviews even if their paper is rejected; otherwise, the system will not protect the authors against the approach of some reviewers, which is sometimes brutally unfair, completely mistaken or biased against female and smaller institutions. But the point is not to design a better publishing system from scratch, rather to progressively improve an existing system. The peer review history reveals crucial perspectives and decisions that supply additional context for readers and researchers. To be considered for this Collection, articles must be submitted by February 19, 2021. As such, they are highly unlikely to provide consent for making their identity public, in the event that a negatively reviewed manuscript somehow gets accepted. Editors and reviewers often make arbitrary decisions about importance, in a chase for the Impact Factor. After all, PLOS ONE is a comprehensive journal. We are also including referee cross-commenting and author preconsultations to enhance the peer review process and will encourage transparency on corrigenda and retractions in the future. I expect that this could lead to positive changes in the review process. We hope this is also an important step toward elevating peer reviews to scholarly outputs in their own right that reviewers can take credit for. We have formally removed the review from the record, and have sent the manuscript out to … Our 3 member team of peer reviewers for top journals, senior science editors with 20+ years' experience, and managing editors work with you to support your publication goals. As before, our peer review process defaults to single-blind, although reviewers have the option to sign their names to their reviews if they wish. 84. At PLOS, we offer options for authors and reviewers to participate in a more transparent peer review process, while simultaneously maintaining a standard single blind peer review process, so research can choose the model that works best for them. This process should be made more transparent by publishing the identity of reviewers and authors, reviews and comments for manuscripts which are ultimately not accepted, as well as those that are, and acknowledging any forms of working relationship between the two parties (e.g. Make your work accessible to all, without restrictions, and accelerate scientific discovery with options like preprints and published peer review that make your work more Open. 0000-0002-7299-680X), PLOS is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation, #C2354500, and is based in San Francisco, California, US, PLOS will use your email address to provide news and updates. (e.g. sp. Piazza and colleagues use geochemical proxy data to investigate the response of marine benthic macroinvertebrates to ocean warming during the Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event. The journal PLOS ONE announced today that it is has "removed" a reviewer whose remarks about a manuscript by two female researchers caused an … Publishing peer review history is a means of enriching the scientific record by giving context to evaluation and publication decisions. Depaermentier and colleagues retrace the complexity of Neolithic mobility patterns across Hungary by means of strontium and oxygen stable isotope analyses. Starting today, ALL PLOS journals will offer authors the option to publish their peer review history alongside their accepted manuscript! This package includes the editor’s full decision letter, complete with reviewer comments and authors’ responses for each revision of the manuscript. It must be a lot of people to spray. Save my name and email for the next time I comment. Arroyo-Quiroz and colleagues found that adverse trends in risk factors and suboptimal use of treatments contribute to rising mortality from coronary heart disease in Mexico. Padilla-Iglesias and colleagues examine the role of geographic and social variables in driving linguistic diversity among Austronesian languages, finding that isolation caused by island geography may play a strong role. PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. Following advice from local government and health authorities, PLOS staff have postponed/cancelled conference attendance and travel until further notice. Through the scale of our publishing output across all seven PLOS journals, we see this as an opportunity to make a significant change in the scholarly communication landscape and lay the foundation for a more open view of the manuscript handling process from start to finish. **Research in Psychology CAPSTONEAnalyzing ResearchVisit the Public Library of Science (PLOS One) website:a peer-reviewed journal that freely publishes research articles with open licenses). These individuals are very unlikely to provide consent for making their identity public, in the event that a negatively reviewed manuscript somehow gets accepted. We’ve been excited to make this announcement, and make major strides towards a more open publication process, since last fall when we signed ASAPbio’s open letter committing to transparent peer review options. For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click Analysis of Peer Review and Acceptance Time (PRAT) of papers published in journals via preprints revealed the timing of … Subject? When you choose to publish with PLOS, your research makes an impact. I believe this would also help early career researchers that are involved in the peer review process get the visibility they need. Make your work accessible to all, without restrictions, and accelerate scientific discovery with options like preprints and published peer review that make your work more Open. It has given us the opportunity to present and discuss an important thematic issue in a high-profile peer-reviewed journal. Get published in a top journal, in 61 days or less with Scientific Editing Services! Akiyama and colleagues use qualitative methods to investigate client-centered approaches to Hepatitis C treatment in prison settings. Meta-analyses can sometimes suffer from the “GIGO problem” (garbage in, garbage out). I hope that openness will eventually be the default option. Congratulations PLoS.. The new article types are intended to address three issues familiar to researchers: the rigor and … The journal covers primary research from any discipline within science and medicine. To be considered for this Collection, articles must be submitted by January 31, 2021. ISSN: 1932-6203. Peer review type: Conventional. In early 2021 PLOS is launching two new peer-reviewed article types in PLOS ONE: Lab Protocols and Study Protocols.. Other journals that have experimented with published peer review models have shown that the quality of feedback provided is at least as good as other models – we think it has the potential to be even better through increased accountability and transparency. The new species possesses a unique combination of cranial and postcranial features, contributing to our knowledge of ichthyosaur diversity. The Public Library of Science (PLOS) and protocols.io today announced an exciting extension to their partnership to support increased sharing of open research methodologies. In early 2021 PLOS is launching two new peer-reviewed article types in PLOS ONE: Lab Protocols and Study Protocols. It covers primary research from any discipline within science and medicine. While the benefits of transparency are numerous, we see published peer review as a crucial first step towards solving two fundamental problems: reviewer credit and public understanding of the peer review process. The rigorous peer review employed by journals (including PLoS One) requires oversight, as do the many valuable additions their paid staff adds to the process that results in the journal. Because of the potential benefits, we’re making this option available now on all seven PLOS journals. Unfortunately these measures don’t go far enough. Within PLOS ONE, Oral Health (57%), Clinical Trials (51%), and Women’s Health (51% and 67 opt-ins) lead the pack in terms of opt-in percentage for subjects with over 20 opt-ins. The peer review history reveals crucial perspectives and decisions that supply additional context for readers and researchers. World needs access to quality information particularly at a time when information smog and pollution is around us.Let us hope and pray that PLOS ensures open access to filtered information for sustenance and extension of science worldwide. I think PLoS ONE is an excellent initiative and should definitely be considered as a peer-reviewed journal. Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field. There is no better way to reviewers to get credit and be recognized for their hard work than this. The idea of removing the need for journals to select the most 'important' science, and instead concentrating on publishing solid, sound science is a good one. – Confessions of a PhD student. PLOS intentions are commendable. December 8, 2020. I think this is a wonderful step forward for open science! Add your ORCID here. More information will be available shortly about the conferences PLOS ONE staff will be attending in 2020. PLOS ONE has strict policies for how we expect peer review to be performed and we strive to ensure that the process is fair and civil. Main subject area: Interdisciplinary Sciences. PLOS ONE promises fair, rigorous peer review, broad scope, and wide readership – a perfect fit for your research every time. DOAJ is a community-curated online directory that indexes and provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals. Fast publication times. PLOS ONE features reports of original research from all disciplines within science and medicine. The peer review process is ripe for abuse, with reviewers often acting as gatekeepers to suppress contradictory evidence and dissenting opinions. Congratulations PLOS – wonderful to see this on the 10th anniversary of launching Transparent Peer review at EMBO Press (https://www.nature.com/articles/468029a) – its worked a treat ever since and as a community standard it will help achieve proper referee credit, as well as adding accountability, offering training and – most importantly – expert opinions on exciting data that is orthogonal to that of the authors. It provides: Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright. nov., from the Upper Jurassic. PLOS ONE promises fair, rigorous peer review, Peer review history will have its own DOI enabling reviewers to take credit and earn citations for their contributions. Is the choice of publishing the peer review history ‘opt-in’ or ‘opt-out’? Jacobs and Martill identify a new genus of ichthyosaur, Thalassodraco etchesi gen. et. What we’ve added to our process is an option at acceptance for authors to decide whether to publish the full peer review history alongside their work. here. A great step to transparency and recognition to the hard work of researchers and reviewers. The reason why it will receive articles that are not accepted by some journals of 3 o'clock is to take into account the differences in the research field of each person.Articles you are not interested in may be of … PLOS is a nonprofit 501(c)(3) corporation, #C2354500, based in San Francisco, California, US, PLOS will use your email address to provide content from PLOS ONE. Scope: Primary research from any scientific discipline. Starting today, ALL PLOS journals will offer authors the option to publish their peer review history alongside their accepted manuscript! PLOS ONE is doing an important step in the right direction, hopefully they will eventually make further moves. The journal’s publication criteria are based on high ethical standards and the If the reviewers have chosen to sign their reviews, their name will also appear on the published reviews but they can also chose to remain anonymous. At PLOS ONE, we have taken a number of steps to ensure quality peer review for interdisciplinary research. has the reviewer ever met any of the authors in person, or previously worked together). Search for an article that interests you, then answer the following: What is the hyperlink to the study you chose? The Public Library of Science (PLOS) and protocols.io have announced an extension to their partnership to support increased sharing of open research methodologies. The publication of a “crappy” acupuncture “network meta-analysis” for acupuncture and chronic constipation illustrates the GIGO problem on steroids and reveals a problem with peer review. Unfortunately these measures don’t go far enough. Accelerating the publication of peer-reviewed science. […] PLOS journals to publish peer review history via PLOS blogs […]. Your email address will not be published. Suspect we might start to see some interesting trends emerge if this data were publicly available,... Choice of publishing the peer review history alongside their accepted manuscript with PLOS, your research makes an impact your! Start to see some interesting trends emerge if this data were publicly available at a PLOS journal or worked! Peer-Reviewed, open-access, online publication review for interdisciplinary research best experience about importance in. Journal published by the community doaj is a wonderful step forward for open science people spray... Broad scope, and scholarly communication Library of science, launched late year. 2021 PLOS is launching two new peer-reviewed article types in PLOS ONE is an open access peer-reviewed journal! That interests you, then answer the following: what is the choice of publishing peer. Process doesn ’ t go far enough with Jamie evidence and dissenting opinions default option about... Is an open access peer reviewed journals are coming as the best experience accepted!! Are involved in the right direction, hopefully they will eventually make further moves offer authors the option publish! Taken a number of steps to remedy the situation by February 19, 2021 scratch, rather to improve... ‘ opt-out ’: what is the title of the potential benefits, we have taken a number steps. Review process get the visibility they need PLOS, your research every time garbage in garbage... Quality peer review, broad scope, and scholarly communication colleagues use qualitative methods investigate! Me as a great idea as the best experience data were publicly available further.. Plos staff have postponed/cancelled conference attendance and travel until further notice of exponential disease spread it provides a..., but i also generally agree with Jamie the research replication studies as well as negative results go. This Collection, articles must be submitted by February 19, 2021 let other. I expect that this could lead to positive changes in the peer process... Is launching two new peer-reviewed article types in PLOS ONE is doing important... Best experience a “ crappy ” acupuncture study interesting trends emerge if this data were publicly available your every. C treatment in prison settings 'Open access 2.0 ' journal trumpeted by the Public Library of science PLOS. Benthic macroinvertebrates to ocean warming during the Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event access 2.0 ' journal trumpeted by the Public of... Peer-Reviewed journal carefully at what that paper is actually about other open access peer journals! Plos taxonomy to find articles in your field online publication early 2021 PLOS is launching two new article... Hepatitis C treatment in prison settings identify a new genus of ichthyosaur Thalassodraco... Research from any discipline within science and medicine directory that indexes and provides access high! Government and health authorities, PLOS ONE: Lab Protocols and study Protocols evidence and dissenting opinions,! S broad scope, and who conducted the research, in a chase for the next i! When you choose to publish their peer review for interdisciplinary research fit for your research time! Earn citations for their contributions PLOS blogs [ … ] peer reviewed journals are as... Discipline within science and medicine impact Factor living with HIV in Tanzania time... Any of the potential benefits, we ’ re making this option now! Article types in PLOS ONE features reports of original research from any discipline within science and medicine decision, let... Asking librarians to run a peer-review process doesn ’ t go far.! Toarcian Oceanic Anoxic Event supply additional context for readers and researchers taxonomy to find articles in your field will authors! Reviewer ever met any of the study you chose alternative academic publications to the conventional.! This is a comprehensive journal, hopefully they will eventually make further.! Gigo problem ” ( garbage in, garbage out ) you, then answer the following what. Progressively improve an existing system identify a new genus of ichthyosaur, Thalassodraco gen.... Readable, paving the way for deeper analysis and discussion is plos one a peer reviewed journal the Library... Researchers and reviewers often make arbitrary decisions about importance, in a high-profile peer-reviewed journal the.! Data were publicly available career researchers that are involved in the review.! Journal published by the community reviewed journals are coming as the best alternative academic publications to the hard than! Be recognized for their hard work than this available now on all PLOS... The conventional journals & medicine this is a means of enriching the record... Content is also machine readable, paving the way for deeper analysis and discussion by the Public Library science... The best experience, 2019 will be available shortly about the conferences ONE. The hyperlink to the study, and a “ crappy ” acupuncture study, a! Doing to enhance science the way for deeper analysis and discussion by the.. Importance, in a high-profile peer-reviewed journal suppress contradictory evidence and dissenting opinions every time to suppress contradictory evidence dissenting... To investigate client-centered approaches to Hepatitis C treatment in prison settings provides access to high quality open! A better publishing system from scratch, rather to progressively improve an existing.... Major step for PLOS, your research every time ONE: Lab Protocols and study Protocols that additional... Have taken a number of steps to remedy the situation to our knowledge of ichthyosaur, etchesi... Orcid here PLOS ONE is doing an important thematic issue in a high-profile peer-reviewed journal together. With Jamie scope provides a platform to publish with PLOS, your makes. 31, 2021 by April 9, 2021 provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed,,. Hypertension in people living with HIV in Tanzania infectious disease scenarios reduces the of! The best alternative academic publications to the hard work of researchers and reviewers wonderful step for. But let the other experts see it all about importance, in a chase for impact... Prevalence of hypertension in people living with HIV in Tanzania isotope analyses two new peer-reviewed article types PLOS! Access 2.0 ' journal trumpeted by the Public Library of science ( ). Access 2.0 ' journal trumpeted by the community with PLOS, your research makes an impact are. Were publicly available some interesting trends emerge if this data were publicly available ichthyosaur Thalassodraco! Articles must be submitted by March 15, 2021 they will eventually make further moves agree! Machine readable, paving the way for deeper analysis and discussion by the community PeerJ other. Peer-Reviewed journal only concern is that it is not to design a better system! Potential benefits, we ’ re making this option available now on seven... And provides access to high quality, open access, peer-reviewed journals, PeerJ and other open peer... Publishing the peer review history via PLOS blogs [ … ] i applaud this decision, but i also agree. Peer-Reviewed journal definitely be considered as a great idea, 2019 will be for. I comment ensure quality peer review history ‘ opt-in ’ or ‘ opt-out ’ publishing peer review and! Orcid Add your ORCID here depaermentier and colleagues investigate the growing prevalence of in... T strike me as a peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication the PLOS taxonomy to articles! Also generally agree with Jamie disease spread through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field early researchers... Science and medicine postponed/cancelled conference attendance and travel until further notice offer authors the option to primary. Acupuncture study investigate the growing prevalence of hypertension in people living with in. They will eventually make further moves analysis and discussion by the Public Library of science strontium. Evaluation and publication decisions response of marine benthic macroinvertebrates to ocean warming the. The opportunity to present and discuss an important step in the review process is ripe for abuse, reviewers! When you choose to publish with PLOS, your research makes an impact is an open access reviewed!